Remembering Bill Friedman

Bill Friedman’s wife, Shoshana, asked me to post this at the CaringBridge Website set up in his honor. Alas, the piece is too long for there, because they have a 5,000-character limit. So instead, I’m posting it here and linking to it. Hope that’s OK.

REMEMBERING BILL FRIEDMAN

By Barney Lerten

November 15, 2008

 

As a reporter, I’ve often said, jokingly, that the worst thing I could do to some people is to quote them accurately.

 

I recall a certain former city manager who once told me a joke, as we talked on the phone. I was laughing – but I was typing. A few days later, Larry – I mean, that unnamed city manager – called me up. The words were in print, and he was not laughing. But he learned anew the power of those three little words – off the record – and what can happen when they’re not used.

 

But when it comes to Bill, the best thing I can do, to salute and reflect on his simple, quiet, but powerful role in Bend government over the past decade or so, is to quote him accurately – something I always try to do, but do better now, covering the council via TV and typing, then I ever did scribbling in the front row at City Hall. Then, now and forever, my handwriting is atrocious.

 

So that should be my first salute to Bill – his voice and timbre was unique, his cadence – starting with a slight stammer – like Jimmy Stewart in his prime, though no one would ever confuse the two. He spoke slowly enough that I could capture his words in my scribbles, and not so slowly that it felt like a day in fourth grade as others read their essays at a maddeningly glacial pace.

 

No, it was as if he wanted you to ride along with his thought process, almost hear the mental gears turning – and make clear that he wasn’t letting his mouth get ahead of his brain, as some politicians – we’re talking other places, not here – often do.

 

His attire was unique as well, for years – hence all the white shirts and jeans surrounding us – and as someone blessedly free of the neck-noose tie in recent years, we were a kindred spirit in that regard.

 

I tell people I have little if any memory, only archives – and the fates have conspired to destroy, lose or burn many of those, which accounts for the nearly fire-hazard stacks of fading newsprint in my home office. So that is where I turned, when asked – and how could I refuse the honor? – to find some ‘quotable quotes’ from Bill, for this occasion.

 

One of the first and funniest I found came from a March 2003 Bend Bugle, when the city was wrestling, as always, with what to charge developers and how to account for all that rapid growth.

 

At one point in the frustrating dialogue, Bill made a simple, three-word funding suggestion: “Magic pixie dust.”

 

“So far,” he said, “It’s a total disaster. The builders have to pay more … and 60 percent has to come from somewhere else. Everybody’s even – we’re all going to lose.”

 

Seven months later, a similar remark: “This is a lose-lose-lose proposition. We can’t get there from here, even with increased taxes.”

 

But perhaps, that same month six years ago, came a truly symbolic time, close to here – dedication of the Bill Healy Bridge – when Bill, a long-time supporter of the controversial project, said he’d thought about borrowing Lincoln’s words at Gettysburg – ‘Four score and seven years ago” – since it seemed to have taken that long to happen.”

 

So the councilor who had donned a Dr. Seuss ‘Cat in the Hat” hat and read a made-up fairy tale, ‘The Lonely Little Log Deck,” during a debate, offered thanks to both those who said yes and no to the bridge, for making it a better span – as he put it, “for taking the time to care.”

 

Skip ahead four years, to May of last year, and when he called a 50 percent hike in some building fees “outrageous and unconscionable,” and the state-driven budget process “unfortunate,” he still managed to put a positive spin on things, as I wrote then, “sounding hopeful that everyone would come to consensus on where to go.”

 

“I’m not uncomfortable,” he said. “This is the way democracy works. I think we’re going to have a good result and move forward.”

 

Last September, as the Juniper Ridge debate roiled, Bill tried to sound a note of reason, as he urged his colleagues not to back the idea of a public vote on the project.

 

As he put it, “We can abdicate our responsibility in some very unfortunate ways.” But he also said, “We need to listen to the community, build ways to discuss” the issue.

 

He was not a man bound to tradition, as in his continued efforts to increase safety and sanity in Bend, by banning fireworks.

 

“I agree it’s an American tradition,” he said. “The question is, should every tradition from the past be carried into the future?”

 

That takes us to last spring, when councilors took a chance – brave or foolish, take your pick – and did not cut Bend Area Transit’s budget, several months before this fall’s fateful third vote on a service that many surveys have shown residents want – they just don’t want to pay more for.

 

“It’s an interesting gamble, but it is a gamble,” Bill said.

 

And as the appreciative audience of mostly senior transit riders filed out of the council chambers to a waiting Dial-A-Ride bus, many thanking councilors for their decision, and the council waited to move on to the next agenda item, Bill told Michael Funke, the stalwart labor organizer, “The ball’s in your court.”

 

Funke replied, “The ball’s in all of our courts.”

 

It’s only fitting that was one of the last times I quoted Bill. Because when it comes to loving, caring about and investing our time, energy – and yes our hard-earned money – in keeping Bend livable and successful, indeed, Bill would tell us all, were he here today, “The ball’s in your court.”

 

And if we approach each issue, large or small, with the grace, wisdom, and yes humor that Bill Friedman displayed in ways large and small, we should all in the end, win or lose, be able to quote Bill accurately, and tell everybody we know: “This is the way democracy works.”

Sorry so long (Best of luck Barack, farewell Bill)

Wow, time flies when you’re not blogging – sorry about that;-) Elections were … well, let’s just say we learned lessons about how early to prepare for new stuff. But it did go pretty well;-)

So now, a watershed moment in American history. Let’s all hope and pray for better days ahead, and that bipartisan is still possible. We shall see.

And tonight came word of a sad passing of what folks used to call a “city father” of Bend – Councilor and former mayor Bill Friedman has passed away at age 72. I liked Bill – I don’t know if I ever saw him lose his temper, but he was a strong voice for good planning to deal with Bend’s rapid growth over the past decade. It’s easy to look back and make judgments, but I have no doubt every vote he cast was done with Bend’s best interests at heart.

He loved to be witty, and to sit back, let others weigh in and then slowly, calmly, crystallize his thoughts. I wrote on the Website tonight about a memorable moment, when he donned a Dr. Seuss ‘Cat in the Hat’ hat to read a fable of ‘The Lonely Little Log Deck,” as he argued for the controversial Southern River Crossing (now Bill Healy Memorial Bridge). A fun moment, from someone who often tried to break a testy council moment with a gentle moment of levity.

He shall be missed, by many.

Personally, I’m going to try for more blog entries. If I can’t do this at least weekly, something’s wrong. Adding WordPress to the laptop’s taskbar should help remind me.

Actually had less news for a change this weekend (yay) allowing time for things like reading, not just skimming The Bulletin (had to drop The Oregonian, who can afford $75 a month!) and last night actually watched a movie with darlin Deb (that “Journey to the Center of the Earth” remake, a fun trip;-)

Hidden treats and tricky touchy topics

First of all, I just wrote a piece that I hope to share on-air – er, on-Web video – about the parts of KTVZ.COM that just don’t get the attention they deserve, because they’re not locally produced.

Of course, folks go to the Website for local news, but have you ever just happened to click on the part marked Lifestyle, off to the right in the Navigation links? Just the Halloween page alone has recipes, safety tips, videos on how to make great kids’ costumes without sewing – the works! And there’s tons of content on every topic imaginable, from technology and money to health, family life etc. Give it a try once in a while!

Okay, then there’s the heavier topic I may/may not do a video piece on, depending on whether I want steam coming out of my ears for all to see.

We have quite the questioning group in our article-comment community – some are the typical armchair quarterbacks you might expect, but some try to put the thumbscrews to ME over why we didnt report this or that, or didn’t know this or that that the cops aren’t telling us, etc.

It gets pretty maddening. So let me make some points.

Other than victims’ names – if they aren’t hurt, we usually leave that out – I use just about EVERYTHING police tell us in news releases, in our online stories. And quite often, more, because there are inevitable ‘holes’ in releases that I try to fill, some more obvious than others (“Captain, when it says ‘vehicle’ – are we talking a car, motorcycle, SUV? And when it says ‘residence,’ do you mean apartment, duplex, mobile home?”

Stuff like that.

But quite often, police don’t include some information in a release because they don’t want to hinder their investigation by revealing too much. Most, I presume, of our online comment-posters realize that, but some get all incensed and claim we or they (or both of us!) are “covering up.” It makes me as mad as the ones who say we “slant” stories in order to make them more exciting. BS. But they have a right to their opinion.

I enjoy some decent head-scratching questions about what “REALLY happened” in this or that notorious crime. But I get heartburn when I see folks claiming to know “the real facts” and throwing them out there AS facts. How do we know Mr. or Ms. Anonymous isn’t just trying to muddy the water and mess up what police and the courts are trying to do?

It’s not as easy a cut-or-dried issue as others where it’s clear where the line is and what goes over it and needs to be deleted (remember, I can’t EDIT postings, only let them be or toss them out – the system doesn’t allow me to edit them, which is good, because then I’D assume liability. No thanks.)

There have been a few folks who’ve called for my head on a platter, claiming the postings – which I admit do get pretty wild, and insensitive at times – tarnishes the station’s reputation. Those daggers thrown at me don’t bother me too much, because I work for an organization that has totally supported our efforts to build dialogue on the news we report. They see the pluses that no doubt have the inevitable minuses, too.

No, what makes me nervous is the threat some of our anonymous postings pose to people’s reputations or ongoing criminal cases. In other words, I fear a lawyer at the door, with a tort claim or subpoena. After all, one doesn’t have to WIN a lawsuit to create an unholy nightmare for the recipient.

So that’s why I often plead, even beg, folks to THINK before they type, and think AGAIN before they hit the ‘submit comment’ button. If they value our exercise in community dialogue, and don’t want to see it vanish, they need to think of the impact of their words, intentional or otherwise. I’ve had to laugh at some postings that rip apart the claims of a crime victim or someone involved in a case, then add at the end, “My prayers to the family” or somesuch. With such comments posted like that, they’re going to NEED those prayers.

I think ulterior motives are boundless in such troubling postings. I have no doubt that I’ve failed at times to be completely equal in deciding when to delete a post for violating Terms of Service – depending on how big the avalanche of disturbing posts, how scared I am at the particular moment, etc. I’m human, and don’t always react to the same things the same way.

But I try. And I tell some folks, “You think those are bad? You didn’t see the ones I DELETED.”

Ugh. Anyway, enough venting for one night. Y’all have a great week!

Election season is coming

That’s meant as a joke, as it already seems to have gone along for, oh, 42 years.

A certain weekly paper here scoffed at our lack of local election coverage, including on the Web. Seeing as how the ballots don’t go out for 3-4 weeks, I feel the criticism was a bit…premature.

What we plan for Decision 2008 at KTVZ.COM is as much live streaming video as MSNBC offers up, tons of CNN and NBC video, and a page chock full of links to candidate and measure Websites, election info from counties and parties, etc., as well as a robust calendar of election-related events (forums and the like) and a billboard with lots of unedited announcements from candidates and campaigns of every stripe).

Oh, and a constantly updated stream of political headlines from AP, blogs from Politico.com – lots of fun stuff, some on the site already, much more to come.

I’d promise to post EVERY news release, but you should see how many we’re getting from the Smith and Merkley campaigns alone. I’d never get any news written!

But we’ll definitely ramp up in coming weeks, giving you a place to turn and seek out information galore. And of course, our local election features will include article comments, and those ought to get really interesting. And they’ll also be a big test of my now-stronger efforts to keep the tone civil and to bounce offensive comments that violate the Terms of Service.

Election Night, we’ll scroll the results through the night and take advantage of frequent news breaks in NBC’s presidential election coverage to tell you who’s up, who’s down and what’s what.

It oughta be a blast!;-)

‘Building a Culture of Dialogue’

I spent four very interesting hours Saturday with all three Central Oregon district attorneys, defense lawyers, public defenders, police, several of us media types – all talking off the record.

But it’s VERY ironic that I write up some of the themes of that talk after probably the most overt, posted lawsuit threat in our many months of online article comment postings.

‘Building a Culture of Dialogue’ was the topic of the gathering, arranged by the Oregon Bar Press Broadcasters Council.

Folks gave up a big part of their Saturday for a free bag lunch and a chance to not just talk, but listen to each other as we discussed a few ‘ripped from the headlines’ scenarios that have dealt with the issue of a free press and how that role can cause issues for those seeking to assure a fair trial.

The justice system has changed little over the decades, as technological and cultural shifts have changed, greatly, what a prospective juror might hear or read, and from who or where. Imagine if bloggers, for example, or anonymous article postings existed back when our justice system was created. It’s not a perfect system, but how can it evolve and cope with those issues?

That wasn’t the topic of Saturday’s session, really. But things like that did come up – imagine, for example, a DA sending an e-mail declining to confirm or deny a juicy rumor, but inadvertently – one must presume inadvertently – including some damning information below the e-mail, or in an attachment.

Can the reporter then report that information? Use it to ask questions/gather more info? Confront the DA, threaten to use it unless he/she provides some on-the-record info on an ongoing investigation?

Reporters have gone to jail for refusing to disclose their sources. Local media don’t print info from anonymous sources, unless they can get an on-the-record corrobration.

I’ve learned to live with and have a strong defense against the whole notion that the media only reports things “because it sells papers” (or TV commercials). I know we report what is considered news, and yes, we have to make a profit to survive.

But I am just as uneasy as many a defense lawyer about how days, weeks, months, sometimes even years of reports about a heinous crime can make their job incredibly difficult, even with all the “alleged” and “innocent until proven guilty” provisos that we include, for our own legal protection as much as anything else.

Finding actual justice after the “court of public opinion” has made up its collective mind is only getting harder in an age when Website can give you a person’s criminal history in an instant, and where increasingly, opinions are shared as thinly-veiled, so-called “facts.”

Small town or large, reporters and editors are often friends, of a sort, with their sources, with people who make news, and with people in the justice system. Wearing the right hat at the right time, and knowing how to do one’s job and not rupture those relationships is one of the struggles reporters and editors face all the time. I’ve said before, “I don’t mind making an official mad for the right reason” is a glib quip that tries to put a light face on it.

But of course, when a source tells us something juicy, we have to “consider the source,” literally – how do they stand to gain, if the tip is true and the info comes to light?

We will never convince some – make that many – people that we strive to get the facts right and that we really wouldn’t run over our own grandmother for a juicy story. One thing I try to do in our article-comment system is explain – sure, defend, too, but mainly explain – how we human-being reporters and photographers and our bosses do what we do, and why.

Because if news is a conversation, we all have to listen as much as we talk. It’s that easy – and that hard.

There’s Bend, and then there’s ‘Bend’

A few years ago, Bend became all of Deschutes County – at least, in the eyes of Uncle Sam. When it created the Bend Metropolitan Statistical Area, or MSA, it included every square inch of Deschutes County – Brothers to Sisters, Tumalo to Terrebonne, Redmond to La Pine. I once knew why, but I forget.;-)

Then there’s the other big government entity that says what’s where – the U.S. Postal Service.

To their way of thinking, “Bend” extends beyond Sunriver, almost to La Pine, west halfway to Sisters, and north halfway to Redmond – in terms of mailing addresses, that is.

So are those folks “Bend” residents? Of course not, they are MILES from the city limits, and never will be part of Bend – and if I know those rural residents as well as I think I do, they’re darn GLAD not to be really “in” Bend, whatever their catalogs, junk mail and bills tell them every day.

I raise the issue because we did a story of a big drug bust down south of Sunriver, and after using “South county” for a while – a most unwieldy term – I dared to call it a “La Pine” home where it happened.

Well, not exactly – but a heck of a lot closer than Bend is!

So of course, I came in for some grief, trying to “lump” these criminals in to give La Pine a black eye.

Puh-leeze. All I want to do is give people a better sense of where these locations are, good, bad or ugly. If someone from Oregon Water Wonderland is elected president – hey, it could happen – I bet folks would be glad to say they are from “La Pine,” or “Sunriver,” or even “Bend.” Even if they’re not really from any of them.

Geography, politics, crime and … well, human nature. Is this a great country or what?