Story choices and the never-perfect formula

Other day, got an e-mail from a nice lady:

Has there been any news reports on the new Sonic Burger opening in Bend? Just curious about it since the last couple days cars have been lined up down the highway waiting to get into the restaurant. I didn’t see anything about it on your website.

My reply:

Well, no, we haven’t covered the latest restaurant opening frenzy in Bend. The paper had a photo and caption, just adding to the hordes who got the word through word of mouth or passing by. We figured it was pretty well known and didn’t need a “free ad” from us- heck, even read a blogger waxing poetic over their little ice cubes.

Her reply – again, in a tone so much appreciated compared to the nasty, accusatory stuff we all too often get:

I appreciate your reply Barney, but I see it in a completely different way. So here’s an example of how one reader/viewer thinks: 
It’s not just the latest restaurant opening frenzy in Bend; it’s so much more. It’s a traffic congestion story for one. On Wednesday, May 21st, traffic was backed up coming from the North as far back as the jail. It became such an issue that the highway department lit up a big flashing sign warning drivers of a heavy traffic area. Peoples lives and commutes were being effected.
You’re not the paper. Who cares what the paper had; not everyone looks at the paper. Is it your norm to pick and choose stories based on what the paper is doing? Isn’t every single news story you do a “free ad” in one way or another? Does KTVZ support the economy in Bend? What about the jobs that are being provided for by Sonic? 
Who cares if you were criticized for doing a story on Trader Joe’s. Shouldn’t dictate how you handle something now. I believe the majority of us appreciated hearing about a new business opening in that area of Bend. Progress is beautiful. Improvements are wonderful.
People in North Bend and Sisters now have a quality fast food restaurant on “their” end of town. It’s been a long time coming. This is a big deal to us. A piece of land in our town is now bursting with life after years of being vacant and depressed. It’s nice to see improvement there after watching the Tom Tom close and the truck stop shut down. I love that things are happening there again.
Sonic has a really good bacon cheese burger toaster. My son really likes them and wants to go get one right now.
And last but not least…It’s a happy story as opposed to sad or scary…which is primarily what we’re used to hearing. We need more happy, exciting and fun in our lives right now. Times are hard. You’re missing out on all the fun. Let’s hear it for Sonic. Welcome to Bend.

And again, my reply:

…you make all your points very well. One thing I forgot to tell YOU was – I’m NOT the news director and am only one voice in about four (news director, show producers) on what we do/don’t cover. And I win some, lose some. Every day I do a list of 30 or so story ideas, and on good days, roughly a third turn into stories. There’s always hundreds more story ideas than there are time in the show, reporters not already tied up, time conflicts etc.
Yes, the paper influences what stories we do and how we treat them, to some degree. So does radio, our TV competition, etc. We don’t necessarily DO or NOT DO stories based on what others do, but it DOES play a role – as it does for every media outlet.
We sure don’t want to look like we’re chasing the paper (or anyone else’s) tail – some folks think we just rip stories out of the paper and read them – nothing could be further from the truth. Give me two stories of roughly equal importance (a judgment call there!), one that other media outlets have had and the other newly discovered by us, and we’ll always do the latter – we don’t want to look/sound like everyone else.
 This is a worthwhile discussion…”

…and I went on to ask if I could post it here. Haven’t heard back, so I figure it’s safe, leaving out her name (I’ll add it if she’s comfortable with it.)

So, let me add on a few thoughts. Some folks think we should cheer good economic news. Others think we should spend more time on the bad things folks do. Heck, we did what I thought was an innocuous story on the crummy weather heading into the weekend, and … well, here’s the post by someone labeled “Stay positive”:

Can we keep the negative news confined to the TV broadcast please? Why does everyone in the world with an internet connection need to know that we’re having bad weather during the first big weekend of the summer season? What good does that do for the Realtors and tourism-driven businesses?”

That prompted the predictable reaction from other commenters of “what in the world???” – and I have to admit, I even wonder if it was tongue-in-cheek? Surely, no one expects us to tilt our coverage to not tell outsiders the weather isn’t perfect every holiday?

We also had a story recently about a USA Today article that referred in its headline to Bend as “the new Boulder.” The reaction in postings was strong, and predictable – many incredulous that anyone could do a nice write-up about Bend – asking if he’d ever even VISITED the place – and others pointing to the long, familiar list of problems here (housing prices dropping like a rock, not enough well-paying jobs, a city government running short of cash, etc. etc.)

It all reminded me of one of my first stories at The Bulletin, back in 1991. Talked to authors of a book called “50 Fabulous Places to Raise Your Family.”

They started with a list of 250 or so metro areas. They thought they’d have trouble narrowing it to 50 – they had trouble coming up with 50 – and they decided they needed to talk to newcomers, because in just about every city listed, the longer folks had lived there, the more incredulous they were that anyone would ever think that town was a good place to raise a family!

That’s because the longer you live somewhere, the more familiar you are with its shortcomings, the more you take for granted its niceties – or miss what it was like when you arrived (wishing someone had shut the gate behind you).

People in Bend like to think that’s something unique to here. It’s a universal trait. Reminds me also of what a fired city manager told me years ago, after he got the heave-ho after many years in the job: “Friends come and go, but enemies accumulate.”

So if you do a positive story about the place you live, you’re a chamber-of-commerce suck-up, a member of the Good Old Boys. If you do a negative one, you’re unfairly attacking, etc. etc. It’s gone from “you can’t please everyone” to “good luck pleasing anyone.”

But still, we keep trying. 😉 What do you think? What if you were a news director – what would be your guiding principles about “free ads,” story selection, etc? Because if nothing else, the Internet has made it possible for everyone to play the role of “news editor,” picking what topics they’re interested in, etc.

Hi Bend Blogs people!

My pal Jake Ortman – man, I wish we could work together, dude – has kindly added my new blog to BendBlogs. So hi, Bend Blogs readers! (Hi Bulletin reporters, editors etc.! I have it on Good Authority you are among Bend Blogs’ most prolific visitors – which means I darn well am not going to post any secret inside info or worse yet, scoops(!) on this page! Heh;-)

I do want to use this spot to thank Jake for all the time he puts in on things like Bend Blogs and Utterly Boring, which I’m sure he wishes could be a full-time gig but hey, don’t we all? I almost made my topic line on this blog “If I have to wear ONE MORE HAT, we’re going to need taller doors.;-)”

But isn’t that the way of the world these troubling days? Doing more and more with fewer people and resources, and still expecting a high (or higher) level of quality? I don’t know which House of Cards is falling faster – that one or the cheap-gas-fueled economy.

Hang on, folks. It’s going to be a bumpy ride;-/ 

Glutton for punishment – and news!

I should be upset, but I’m energized by the busiest Central Oregon Saturday, news-wise, I can remember in months.

Fitting it should be on a Memorial Day weekend – a fairly unusual, even bizarre set of incidents that had me working far more than planned tonight. I should be bummed, but I’m not. It was interesting because of the variety, even though the top story is another tragic mystery, of a Culver teen who died running from a police traffic stop in Bend.

People must think I never sleep. (That’s more our cat Salem’s doing. I’ll have to tell you about him sometime. He puts us to bed, wakes us up far too early with a talking whine that cuts through any level of sleep. But he means well, the mangy varmint. 😉

Guilt-driven and proud of it (plus Out-of-This-World Reality Show)

One of the main reasons I’ve started this blog is that I haven’t done the very thing I prod our reporters about all the time – post a text version of our video packages.

Not that I don’t keep busy;-)

Anyway, here’s my riff off what I talked about on-air Friday, being a space nut since I was a little kid.

My father worked for Boeing, as an engineer. When my brothers and I moved to be with him and his new wife (our stepmom) in New Orleans, I had a vague idea what he worked on, and moreso after we moved to Cocoa, Florida, in 1966 (the year Gannett began a little paper there called Today, a forerunner of USA Today).

So he worked on the space program, and I probably told him I was proud of him as often as he told me he loved me – rarely if ever (such were father-son relationships in those pre-Donahue prehistoric days).

But I was a victim of bad timing in this obsession.

We moved to Florida after Gemini ended, left before Apollo really began – I was living there when a fire killed the three astronauts of Apollo 1 on the launchpad. I believe my father worked on the escape system (a guy wire of sorts) after that tragedy.

Then we moved to Kent, Wash., outside Seattle (where he went to work on the ill-fated SuperSonic Transport, or SST project). When man landed on the moon on July 20, 1969. I wasn’t glued to a TV set – I was on my Boy Scout troop’s 50-mile hike, from Stevens Pass to Snoqualmie Pass (a make-up hike for one called off a year earlier, because one of the Scouts got lost and a search ensued).

Those were the days long before VCRs, much less TiVos, so… of course I saw the grainy black-and-white footage later, over and over, but didn’t get to feel that palpable sense of fright and awe and inspiration most of the planet did.

Oh well.

I did follow closely every moon mission after that, had a long-lost (sigh) friend named Gene Tichy and we’d watch them together – he’d even use a rudimentary videotape system to record them.

So ever since, I’ve been thrilled by spaceflight and saddened by the periodic tragedies.

On Sunday afternoon, another nail-biter much like the super-successful Mars Rovers comes up, as the Phoenix Mars Lander is due to make the first try in 30-plus years at landing on Mars, not by bouncing inside a big ball of sorts, but using retrorockets.

And because it’s 432 million miles away, it’ll take 15 agonizing minutes for the signals to reach Earth and to know whether it made it, or crashed. NASA TV again will be watching for all of those pensive minutes, until the cheers erupt, or… no, the cheers erupt. Ya gotta believe.

This is my kind of reality show.

UPDATE: 5/25, 5:45 pm: It did it! Phoenix is on the Martian surface! I just added breaking news atop KTVZ.COM and sent out a breaking-news e-mail. And now – the first image from the surface! Yay!

And here it is - the Phoenix Lander\'s first image of Mars\' northern reaches

Thunder, lightning and article comment wildness

The trick with blogging, I’ve decided, is to do it often enough you get in the groove and don’t feel every entry has to be stellar, Shakespearean and for the ages.

Yeah, right.

I’ll be talking a lot here about my favorite Website and the changes and permutations there. Er, here. (You see, our plan is to insert this blog INTO the Website, and to do that for several folks at the station. Me first, of course;-) Thanks to my UPS, despite thunder and lightning, I feel safe ruminating for a few.

We began an article rating and comment system earlier this year, and just changed to one provided (in beta test) by our Website provider, World Now, through its partner, JS-Kit. Already, my wish list is growing (bigger typeface! No gray on white! etc.) but I do like much about it – especially that it’s built-in to our CMS (content management system), not a bolt-on (though my pal Karl Sanford in Palm Desert built a heck of a bolt-on;-)

Anyway, I’m not “pre-moderating” the comments in the new system, like I did before. But I think the ability to vote on others’ comments or mark them as offensive have kept a little bit of the wild and weird and nasty from emerging.

So far.

You see, I’ve likened anonymous article comments to an open-mic night in a place with all the lights out. Some will say worthy things, and others will, in essence, belch into the microphone, abusing the anonymity.

Always been that way.

So the comments I see each day have been interesting, enlightening, entertaining, head-shaking, bizarre, sad, depressing, and frightening in either the “these people don’t live here I hope!” or “Boy, would we get sued posting this” way.

Still, as I told all in the co. I work for, lack of dialogue of this kind makes a Website seem, cold, sterile, one-way and old fashioned. It’s worth putting up with the crazies or near-crazies to hear what people think, feel and say. It’s actually resulted in on-air stories some times. And like this blog, it’s also allowed me/us to clear the air and explain things on occasion.

I’ve also learned that I don’t have to weigh in a lot and, for example, defend the station or myself from non-constructive, harsh, unfair criticism – others do it for me, without me ever asking to. It’s sort of a self-regulating mechanism.

I surely can understand how the corporate world is scared, especially in a legal sense, of such unfettered dialogue. The point I’ve tried to make is that these conversations are happening anyway. Wouldn’t you like for them to happen within earshot, rather than behind your back – so you can be aware and take action, even respond and explain?

And of course, the answer usually is, “Well, yeah, but…” and the buts are all very logical and understandable, but they don’t reflect the reality of what my favorite new media blogger, Jeff Jarvis calls “news as conversation.”

People have too many time pressures, too many options for gathering information the old ways to think we can just take the old styles and put them in this new medium. We are not the gatekeepers of information any more, and it’s naive to think so. We just want to be their favorite hangout, a good source of information and a lively dialogue spot – enlightening and entertaining, and yes, sometimes aggravating.

Such is life…;-)

Blog and blog and blog again

So here I go, blogging again – I’ve been trying this since before the word “blog” existed, remember Microsoft Publisher, anyone?

 

Anyway, I’ve tried several blog or Web-publishing programs over the years, and want to try this one, too.

I have a better reason to do so this time. As many of you may know, this is also the title of my twice-weekly (Monday and Friday) segments on NewsChannel 21 at 5, in Bend, Oregon.

That’s fun, but I love give and take, and room to, well, be the Babblin’ Barn many know I can be.

I also want a chance to engage in more dialogue with our viewers and Website visitors (I’m very proud of KTVZ.COM) about what I/we do, why, how, etc. Some folks couldn’t care less. Others, I’ve found, are intensely curious about TV journalism, and media in general, and find darn few places to ask questions and get answers. I hope this will become one of them.

(WordPress has given me some funky stuff – for some reason, every time I tried to insert a photo, what it appears to have done is opened a new window with the old post – but no sign of a pic. At one point, that meant I had like SEVEN photos in the one posting! What’s up with that?

Anyway, glad to be here, and hope we can share a little dialogue of the friendly, helpful, interesting kind. I’m looking forward to it.